Resolve Prettier explicitly for isolated layout - #80529
Conversation
|
Size Change: 0 B Total Size: 7.74 MB |
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
|
Flaky tests detected in 2afa013. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/29845526495
|
What? ## Why?
Follow Up of #80422 (comment)
Resolves
prettierexplicitly from within the test file instead of relying on it being hoisted to the rootnode_modules.How?
prettier's path frompackages/prettier-config/test/index.jsusingrequire.resolve( 'prettier' ).resolveConfigScriptviaJSON.stringify( prettierPath )instead of using a barerequire( 'prettier' )string.Use of AI Tools